IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the matter between TREATMENT ACTION CAMPAIGN First Applicant HAROON SALOOJEE Second Applicant CHILDREN'S RIGHTS CENTRE Third Applicant and MINISTER OF HEALTH First Respondent MEC'S FOR HEALTH Second to Tenth Respondents AFFIDAVIT I the undersigned CATHERINE JEAN VAWDA do hereby make oath and say: 1. I am an adult woman of full legal capacity, employed at First Floor 480 Smith Street, Durban. 2. I am the Director of the Children's Rights Centre, which is the Second Applicant in this matter. I am duly authorised by a resolution of the trustees of the Childrens' Rights Centre on 13 August 2001, to bring this application and make this affidavit on its behalf. I attach marked CJV1 a copy of that resolution. 3. Except where the context indicates otherwise, the facts stated in this affidavit are within my personal knowledge. To the best of my knowledge and belief the contents of this affidavit are true and correct. The Children's Rights Centre 4. The Children's Rights Centre ('the Centre') is a non-profit, charitable trust. It was originally established in 1987 under the name of the Southern Natal Children's Rights Committee, as an informal grouping of people and organisations concerned with the issue of children's rights. It was formally established as a trust in 1998. 5. The Centre has its office at 1st Floor, 480 Smith Street, Durban. 6. The Trust was created by a deed of trust and donation between the Southern Natal Children's Rights Committee and the founding trustees. I attach marked CJV2 a copy of the trust deed, and marked CJV3 a copy of the letters of authority issued by the Master of the High Court. 7. The goal of the Centre, as set out in the preamble to the Trust Deed, is to advocate for the rights of children. The Centre works to establish a sustainable children's rights culture in the context of human rights principles. This culture would entrench the Convention on the Rights of the Child not only into the new laws of our land, but also into the fabric of society and human relations. 8. The objectives of the Centre include the following: 8.1 Raising awareness 8.2 Undertaking advocacy initiatives 8.3 Facilitating a movement for childrens rights 9. A major part of the activities of the Centre is in the health sector. 10. The Centre has actively participated in lobbying and campaigning for the implementation of a comprehensive programme for the prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV, and for the provision of Nevirapine. We have called meetings, organised workshops, spoken on public platforms, participated in marches, distributed pamphlets and posters, written articles, organised workshops, and distributed 1000 postcards addressed to the President, calling for urgent implementation of nationwide prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV. 11. I respectfully submit that the Centre has standing to participate in this litigation on the following basis: 11.1 It acts in its own interest, in order to achieve the purposes set out in the trust deed. 11.2 It acts on behalf of infants, who are being or will be born in the public health sector to mothers with HIV, and who in the nature of things can not act in their own name. 11.3 It acts in the public interest. There is a public interest in the effective enforcement of the constitutional rights of children, and in ensuring that the government takes all reasonable measures to prevent or reduce the transmission of HIV to children from their mothers. 12. I have read the founding affidavit of Siphokazi Mthathi. I endorse and adopt what is said there with regard to the nature of HIV/AIDS, the epidemiology of HIV/Aids, antiretroviral drugs and Nevirapine, the availability of Nevirapine in South Africa, the pilot scheme, and the costs and benefits of Nevirapine. 13. In particular, on behalf of the Centre I endorse and adopt the submissions which are made in that affidavit with regard to the unconstitutionality, irrationality and unlawfulness of the failure of the Respondents to make Nevirapine available in the public health sector, and the failure to develop and implement a comprehensive programme for the prevention of mother to child transmission. 14. Through its advice activities and through its networking with other organisations, the Centre regularly comes into contact with women who have HIV and whose children have been born with HIV, and who have not had antiretroviral therapy available at the time of birth. 15. One of the most heart breaking parts of our work is dealing on a regular basis with mothers whose children are very ill or dying, in situations where we believe that the medical evidence shows that this could have been avoided. 16. In my experience the mothers are often very angry and confused by the failure of the government to provide them and their children with treatment which would have prevented this situation. 17. I respectfully submit that the conduct of the Respondents, as set out in the affidavit of Siphokazi Mthathi, has led to a situation which is in breach of the rights of children in Section 28 of the Constitution, and in particular section 28(1)(c), section 28(1)(d) and section 28(2). 18. I further respectfully submit that this conduct is in breach of the obligations of the state, and the rights of children, under the Convention on the Rights of the Child. South Africa has ratified this Convention, and the state is bound by its provisions. 19. I attach marked CJV4 a copy of the Convention, and I refer in particular, but not exclusively, to Articles 6 and 24. 20. The Centre has tried every means at its disposal to persuade the government to make Nevirapine available in the public health sector, and to institute and implement a comprehensive programme for the prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV. I have described some of those activities above. Regrettably, our efforts have failed. We see this litigation as the last measure open to us to compel the government to do what we believe its obliged to do in terms of the Bill of Rights and its international obligations. 21. I ask that the Court grant an order as set out in the Notice of Motion. ------------------------------------- CATHERINE JEAN VAWDA THUS SIGNED AT DURBAN ON THIS THE DAY OF AUGUST 2001, THE DEPONENT HAVING STATED THAT SHE KNOWS AND UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THIS AFFIDAVIT, WHICH IS THE TRUTH, THAT SHE HAS NO OBJECTION TO TAKING THE OATH, WHICH SHE CONSIDERS BINDING ON HER, AND HAVING TAKEN THE OATH IN THE PRESCRIBED FORM --------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER OF OATHS 5