Treatment Action Campaign News, 24 May 2000. * The Global March for Treatment Access will commence at 15:00 on 9 July, 2000 outside the Durban City Hall. We re-emphasize that this will be a peaceful, non-violent march. Rumours that the march will be an attempt to disrupt the International AIDS Conference are COMPLETELY UNTRUE. * Doctors Without Borders (MSF) and TAC have organised a conference on treatment access for the 9th of July in Durban to coincide with the International AIDS Conference. Invitations will be sent to all people on the list shortly. The invitation is in RTF format. Download it from www.tac.org.za/invite.rtf. The MSF/TAC conference will end shortly before the global march begins. * The TAC website has been revamped. It contains many new articles. See it at www.tac.org.za. * TAC held a very successful National Committee Meeting in Durban from 20-21 May. Contents * An article by TAC chairperson, Zackie Achmat, in response to the offer by the big 5 drug companies. * A copy of a press release sent by ACT-UP, HEALTH ACTION INTERNATIONAL and MEDICINS SANS FRONTIERES in response to the announcement by the big 5 drug companies. ---------------------------------------------- Copied for fair use: Article by Zackie Achmat for the Sowetan "HIV/AIDS drug prices will be reduced by more than 85%". This announcement was made by five of the biggest drug companies together with the United Nations Joint Programme on AIDS (UNAIDS) and the World Bank. In its release, UNAIDS was more cautious and claimed that "a new dialogue has begun between five pharmaceutical companies and United Nations organizations to explore ways to accelerate and improve the provision of HIV/AIDS-related care and treatment in developing countries". Should treatment activists in South Africa and across the world welcome this announcement? Yes. But, only with caution and scepticism. Every 10 minutes a person with HIV/AIDS in Southern Africa will die. These deaths are premature and unnecessary. Why? Because there are medications that can and will keep adults and children with HIV/AIDS alive, healthy and productive for many years. Children are orphaned daily—yet, with medicines their parents can live to take care of them. Price and excessive profits by drug companies denies poor people access to health. Activists and health care workers are not alone in taking this stand. Last week, James Wolfensohn, president of the World Bank told the Wall Street Journal—the leading US business newspaper: "With the prices so high, there was little incentive for the governments to build the health infrastructure to provide care". Real price reductions will allow governments, international agencies, the private sector and civil society to rapidly develop infrastructure to provide treatment. It is the responsibility of our government to lead the struggle for price reductions and the development of infrastructure to ensure that children and adults with HIV/AIDS receive life-saving treatments. The South African government with other African countries should set up a team to plan and negotiate real drug price reductions, access to testing and monitoring equipment, additional clinical and health care infrastructure support from the UN, the World Bank and the drug companies. International public opinion will support such action. Therefore, the drug companies are trying to take control of the agenda. To ensure access to HIV drugs for the majority of people, we must carefully assess what they propose. In a statement yesterday, Project Inform, one of the oldest and most respected HIV/AIDS treatment education organisations in the US identified "at least three critical issues not clearly addressed in the public statements made by the companies: Do the price reductions come without strings or are they conditional upon the participating country’s agreement to give up their rights to other treatment access mechanisms? Does the proposed agreement cover only older, first generation AIDS drugs or also the newer, more effective and easier-to-use therapies? Will companies offer different discounts adjusted to the economic realities of individual countries?" Drug companies must not be allowed to use the United Nations to protect their excessive profits, or, to stop governments from buying good quality generic equivalents at the lowest possible price. The companies involved in this initiative with the United Nations are Glaxo Wellcome, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Roche, Merck and Boehringer Ingelheim—"The Big Five". The Nobel Prize-winning group Médecins Sans Frontičres (Doctors Without Borders) provided figures to the South African Parliament last week. Between 1997 and 1999, sales on two of the Glaxo Wellcome anti-Aids drugs - less production costs, reached $694-million (about R4,858-billion) for AZT and $1,453-billion (about R10-billion) for 3TC. Bristol Meyers Squibb (BMS) made $379-million (about R2,653-billion) on ddI and $1,136-billion (about R7,552-billion) for d4T. These are drugs that were mainly developed by universities and the US government, therefore research and development costs to the companies are minimal. The same drugs—AZT, 3TC, DDI and D4T can be produced in Thailand, India, Brazil and Canada at lower prices than the 85% price reductions on offer. But in Thailand, Bristol Meyers Squibb has used every means possible to prevent that government from making anti-HIV drugs available to its people. Take Nevirapine (NVP) made by Boehringer Ingelheim—a single dose of this drug is particularly effective in preventing mother-to-child transmission. It is also very cheap. But, its price can be reduced by more than half through generic competition. Boehringer Ingelheim’s price is R32.26 and a good quality generic manufacturer in India Cipla sells the same drug at less than R15.00. Doctors Without Borders stated that "This agreement does nothing to stimulate countries' rights to produce or import inexpensive quality drugs, an important part of the long-term solution to improving access to essential medicines." But these are facts and figures. They affect people with HIV/AIDS directly. Last week, the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) welcomed the UNAIDS and "Big Five" announcement at Parliament but warned that drug companies should not tie the hands of governments against finding the lowest possible prices. It asked Parliament to provide data on the patents and prices for all drugs to treat opportunistic infections and all anti-retrovirals. So far, drug companies have only mentioned anti-retrovirals. Christopher Monaka told the Parliamentary Committee that he has thrush. Conradie Hospital did not have Diflucan produced by Pfizer because of the costs. No other drug would help his thrush. He spoke of the Pfizer campaign and explained that while the donation for cryptococcal menigitis was welcome, people with thrush were excluded. Health care workers frustrated at lack of resources were not treating people with HIV/AIDS with dignity. Christopher Monaka asked the government to ensure that Pfizer reduce the price of Diflucan from R36.50 to less than R4.00 per 200mg capsule before 1 July 2000. "Every day many people died because they do not have access to the drug." Sindiswa Godwana said that she was unemployed. She said the majority of people in South Africa were poor and in the hospitals people with HIV were not even receiving multivitamins. She gets them from her support group but most support groups don’t even have access to vitamins. She told the Parliamentary Committee that they needed to ensure that opportunistic infections were properly treated and anti-retroviral drugs were made available. She argued that this would be possible if government forced drug companies to lower their prices. "Why was the government waiting?" Fagmida Miller explained that she was on a clinical trial. Her viral load was undetectable and her health was good. This was the only way that she could get treated for HIV. She asked the government to ensure that clinical trials are properly conducted. Every adult and child with HIV/AIDS should have access to treatment. No-one should be excluded because of poverty or for any other reason. The drug companies’ announcement shows that the effort of treatment activists in South Africa and across the world has been necessary. But, success will depend on further mobilisation. Therefore, the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) and HealthGap Coalition in the United States have won the endorsement for a Global March for Treatment at the International AIDS Conference in Durban on 9 July 2000 from Cosatu, Nactu, Fedusa, Sangoco, Jubilee 2000 and many other organisations. The march will be preceded by a joint conference of MSF and the TAC on improved access to drugs in developing countries. Government must lead on this issue. We all know the drug companies are profiteering and that people die because drug costs are too high. Criticism is not enough—leadership and action from government will ensure that the announcement by UNAIDS and the Big Five becomes a reality and that people in poor countries receive HIV treatments. Zackie Achmat a member of TAC has HIV and he refuses to take anti-retroviral medication until it is available in the public sector. For information on the conference or march contact: msf-tac@mweb.co.za or (TAC) 031 3043673 or 011 403 0390. ---------------------------------------------- Copied for fair use. ACT UP, HEALTH ACTION INTERNATIONAL (HAI), MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES (MSF) PRESS RELEASE Public health advocates call for transparency on global medicine pricing information Geneva 17th May 2000. On the day that the 53rd World Health Assembly (WHA) discusses HIV/AIDS; confronting the epidemic (resolution EB105.R17), public health advocates call for the WHA to provide global pricing information on quality medicines available to treat people living with HIV/AIDS and other opportunistic infections. Member states should also be advised on the management, legal and regulatory issues that must be addressed to ensure access to these medicines. Information on quality generic and patented drug prices enables countries to rationalise their purchasing policy. Developing countries could use this tool to maintain control over their public health policies. It is clear around the world that where generic competition exists, prices of medicines are considerably lower. However, there continue to be regulatory and legal barriers to purchasing and importing medicines. These need to be resolved. “This is the World Health Assembly not the world intellectual property assembly.” said Ellen ‘t Hoen, MSF health policy advisor. “The WHO and countries are here to ensure that the public health of populations takes priority over private profit. Member states need information and choice to ensure the best healthcare for their people.” she added. The pricing data would empower developing countries to purchase greater quantities of affordable life-saving medicines to ensure that treatment options are not restricted to limited conditional price reductions which are dependent on corporate generosity. Last week’s statement of intent between UNAIDS and several multi-national pharmaceutical companies camouflages the real issue that long term sustainable solutions are needed on an international level. This agreement does not encourage transfer of technology, nor does it stimulate countries’ rights to produce or import inexpensive quality drugs, an important part of the long-term solution to improving access to medicines. Affected countries in Africa were not included in the preparation discussions of the price reduction and public/private partnership. Affected countries around the world must be included in the process to find long term sustainable solutions. For information at the WHA please call: Lisa Hayes (HAI) +316 24 22 5847 Samantha Bolton (MSF) + 32 496 250 064 Gaelle Krikorin or Asia Russell (ACT UP) +33 609 177 055