Treatment Action Campaign Electronic Newsletter 7 March, 2001 (INCLUDING A JOINT PRESS RELEASE) Dear subscribers Many thanks to all our international supporters in Brazil, Philippines, US, UK, Kenya, Thailand, France, Italy, Denmark, Australia, Germany and elsewhere for the phenomenal support given to TAC over the last few weeks. Thank you for your protests, marches, civil disobedience actions, press releases, photographs, letters of support and organising. Together, we have sent a clear message to the multinational pharmaceutical industry and their supporters that we are organised, informed and a force to be reckoned with. Thank you also to all our local volunteers, staff members, researchers and legal experts who helped get the court case and demonstrations off to a fine start. The TAC court affidavits are available on the TAC website archives page. Regards, Nathan Geffen Website: www.tac.org.za Mail: info@tac.org.za ### Contents 1. Joint Press Release by Cosatu, TAC, MSF, Oxfam and the Consumer Project on Technology 2. Why TAC applied to join the court case as a friend of the court. ### PRESS RELEASE 6 MARCH 2001 ISSUED BY: COSATU, TAC, MSF, OXFAM AND CONSUMER PROJECT ON TECHNOLOGY HIGH COURT ACCEPTS THE RIGHT OF PEOPLE WITH HIV TO BE HEARD National and international organizations welcome the judge's decision. PRETORIA, South Africa, 6 March 2001- National and international organizations today welcomed the South African High Court's decision to accept evidence from the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC), which represents people living with HIV. Having been accepted as a 'Friend of the Court', TAC will give evidence about how brand name medicines are unaffordable for millions of people living with HIV in South Africa. "For the first time, the pharmaceutical industry will have to justify to South Africa and to the world why their drug prices are so high and why their patents should be so aggressively protected, when millions of people are dying and cheaper drugs exist," said Zackie Achmat, chairperson of the Treatment Action Campaign. This follows a week of worldwide demonstrations in support of the South African government, and calling on companies to drop the case. Thousands of people from unions, churches, NGOs and people living with HIV/AIDS took to the streets in Pretoria, Cape Town, and Durban. "We thank the efforts of our members whose voices have ensured that the courts have understood the importance of this matter," said Joyce Phekane, Deputy President of COSATU. International and national organizations however condemned the pharmaceutical industry for first trying to block TAC's application, and for then requesting a further four months to reply to the application. "The pharmaceutical companies have already delayed this case for three years. Every day's delay means no affordable medicines and more people dying," said Dr Eric Goemaere, Head of Mission for MSF's programs in South Africa. The judge acknowledged that this case was of vital importance to people in South Africa and around the world and only granted industry three weeks to respond to TAC's application. The court case will resume from 18 to 26 April, 2001. TAC, COSATU, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Oxfam, and the Consumer Project on Technology underlined they would continue to support the South African government's position in this case. For further information please call: TAC - Zackie Achmat: +27 83 467 11 52; COSATU - Siphiwe Ngcina +27 82 821 7456; MSF - Toby Kasper +27 82 332 9713; Oxfam - Matt Grainger +27 82 445 3005; Consumer Project on Technology - Jamie Love +1 202 361 3040. ### WHY TAC IS SEEKING TO JOIN THE COURT CASE AGAINST THE PMA? (Issued on Monday 5 March) For more than two years, the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) has asked the drug companies to drop the case against the South African government unconditionally. There are very simple reasons for this. The Medicines Act is constitutional and does not violate any international agreement. This case is about greed. For the companies their right to profiteer is non-negotiable. For TAC, the rights to life, dignity, access to health care services and the best interest of children are non-negotiable. These are the grounds that we place before the Court. In addition, the outcome of this Court Case will affect millions of people with HIV/AIDS in our country. Yet, there is no voice in the Court of the people most directly affected by drug company greed. TAC has placed a cogent case before the Pretoria High Court defending the rights of people with HIV/AIDS and all people to affrodable and quality medicines. TAC believes that the government has a duty to make medicines affordable for all. Below is a list of actions that TAC has undertaken to ensure that the case against the government is withdrawn. These facts have been drawn to the Court's attention. THE HISTORY OF THE TAC'S ENGAGEMENT WITH THE ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT Under its description of "logistical considerations" for declining consent to the TAC's request for permission to act as amicus the PMA attorney of record states that the TAC "should have come to the matter at an earlier time. It could clearly have done so since it knew of it, on its own version, for at least 25 months." 1.The TAC founding press statement on 9 December 1998 called for a fast on Human Rights Day, 21 March 1999, to "pressure the government and the pharmaceutical sector to seriously address the need for equitable and affordable access to treatment and care for all people with HIV/AIDS". 2.On 21st March 1999, TAC members conducted a national "Fast to Save Lives". The Cape Town fast at St. George’s Cathedral attracted at least 200 people. They were addressed by Gender Commissioner Farid Esack and the ANC’s provincial health secretary - Dr. Saadiq Kariem. In Soweto more than 500 people representing trade unions, religious bodies, AIDS organisations, the South African Communist Party, the National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality gathered outside Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital where they were addressed by Mark Heywood of the AIDS Law Project, Zackie Achmat (NCGLE), Dr. Glenda Gray of Baragwanath Hospital, Bishop Paul Verryn of the Methodist Church, Ms Florence Ngobeni (NAPWA) and Gauteng Provincial Health Department’s Dr. Liz Floyd –Director of HIV/AIDS, STDs and Infectious Diseases. 3.On 28 April 1999, TAC members demonstrated outside the premises of the Seventh Applicant, Glaxo Wellcome, in Midrand, Gauteng. A letter to Glaxo Wellcome was presented by Ms Sharon Ekambaram, TAC's co-ordinator in Gauteng, and received by Mrs Vikki Ehrich, Director Corporate Affairs, and Dr Peter Moore, Chief Medical Officer. 4.On 30th April 1999, TAC Chairperson Mr Zackie Achmat, Ms Phumi Mtetwa and other TAC representatives met with the then Minister of Health, Dr Nkosazana Zuma. Minister Zuma called on TAC to actively support measures taken by the government to lower the price of essential medicines. 5.On 5th July 1999, the TAC held a protest outside the Consulate of the United States of America in Johannesburg. The picket was led by TAC Executive member Mr Mazibuko Jara and called for an end to US government interference with SA law making and specifically questioned US government support for the litigation of the Applicants against the Amendment Act. A Memorandum was handed over to a US official, Mr Fred Kaplan. 6.On 26th July 1999, TAC representatives, led by Mr Randall Howard, the General Secretary of the Transport and General Workers Union, met with representatives of the US Government to receive a response to the TAC Memorandum. 7.On 13th September 1999, TAC issued a press release in response to the announcement by the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers' Association (PMA), the First Applicant in this matter, that it had "suspended" its legal action. The press release described the suspension as a "public relations exercise" and demanded the "unconditional withdrawal of the legal action by the PMA." 8.On 22 September 1999, TAC held a demonstration outside the offices of the First Applicant, (PMA) calling for the unconditional withdrawal of the court action to provide the basis for a negotiated settlement. The TAC delegation was led by Zackie Achmat and a Memorandum was handed over to Ms. Maureen Kirkman, Head of Scientific and Regulatory Affairs at the PMA. In Cape Town, the TAC demonstrated at the offices of the Seventh Applicant, Mr. Ben Plumley and Ms. Vicki Ehrich received a memorandum from the TAC. Dr. Hermann Reuter of the TAC was present as was Professor Greg Hussey of Red Cross Children’s Hospital. 9.On 30th September 1999, TAC Executive members including, Zackie Achmat, Mark Heywood and Phumi Mtetwa held a meeting with the Minister of Health, Dr Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, and the Director General of Health, Dr Ayanda Ntsaluba, where the need for a rapid resolution of the court case was discussed. 10.On 30th November 1999, TAC Executive members Zackie Achmat, Mark Heywood and Sharon Ekambaram met with the Chief Executive Officer of the First Applicant, PMA, Mrs Miryeena Deeb, Mrs Maureen Kirkman of the PMA, and a representative from Abbott Laboratories. The TAC again requested the withdrawal of the Court action and discussed the contested section 15C. Mrs Deeb offered to revert to the TAC before January 15th 2000 with what the PMA considered to be a suitable re-wording of Section 15C of the Medicines Act. At the same time a prayer vigil was held outside the PMA offices to commemorate those who had died of AIDS related illnesses in 1999. 11.On 1st December 1999, Mrs Vicki Ehrich of the Seventh Applicant, Glaxo Wellcome, accepted a petition from TAC members in Khayelitsha calling for a lowering of the price of their patented medicine AZT (Zidovudine). Dr. Hermann Reuter, TAC Western Cape Executive member, was present. 12.On 13th March 2000, a group of twenty TAC representatives, led by Mr Mark Heywood, met with Mr Barry Smith, the Chief Executive Officer of the pharmaceutical company Pfizer (SA). The purpose of the meeting was to request a price reduction of Pfizer’s patented medicine Diflucan (Fluconazole) or alternatively for Pfizer to issue TAC or the South African Government with a voluntary licence for the use of this medicine 13.On 3rd April 2000, TAC members led by Mr Mark Heywood demonstrated outside Pfizer offices in Johannesburg. Simultaneously TAC members led by Midi Achmat and Deena Bosch demonstrated outside the offices of Warner Lambert (formerly the Twenty-fifth Applicant) in Cape Town. My legal representative has advised me that Warner-Lambert has since withdrawn from this matter. 14.On 6th April 2000, TAC executive members Zackie Achmat, Mark Heywood and Theodora Steele met with Minister of Health, Dr Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, to discuss the affordability of essential medicines. 15.On 9th & 10th May 2000, TAC members, led by Siphokazi Mthati and including Christopher Moraka, (a TAC member who died of AIDS related illnesses on 27th July 2000) made presentations to a public hearing of the Parliamentary Health Portfolio Committee. TAC members called for measures to be taken to gain access to medicines and for the resolution of the court case. The First Applicant was represented by Mrs. Deeb and the Seventh Applicant was represented by Mrs. Ehrich. 16.On June 20th 2000, a mediation between the TAC and First Applicant and its members was due to take place in Johannesburg, facilitated by Justice Edwin Cameron and Dr John Matjila. The resolution of the court case was one of the matters that had been tabled for discussion. After initially formally agreeing to take part in the mediation, the PMA's representatives unilaterally withdrew from this meeting, without explanation, on June 18th. 17.On June 26th 2000, a demonstration was held outside the Pfizer (Pfizer is a member of the PMA) plant in Pietermaritzburg led by TAC member Mr Zamokhule Zwane. The purpose of the demonstration was to highlight issues of access to essential medicines. 18.On July 9th 2000, the TAC organized a Global March for Access to HIV/AIDS treatments. Over 6000 people participated. A Memorandum was addressed to the South African government and the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (IFPMA). This Memorandum called for an end to the litigation. It was handed over by the Vice-President of COSATU, Ms Joyce Phekane, to the Minister of Health, Dr Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, the Executive Director of the Joint United Nations Programme on AIDS (UNAIDS), Dr Peter Piot, and the President-elect of the International AIDS Society (IAS), Dr Stephano Vella. 19.On 14th October 2000, after all entreaties to lower the price of fluconazole had failed ; people were continuing to die because of lack of access to fluconazole and not a single tablet of the Pfizer "donation" promised in March 2000 had reached the public sector hospitals, TAC chairperson, Zackie Achmat brought a safe, effective and good quality generic into the country to defy the patent abuse by Pfizer. In November the Medicines Control Council (MCC) granted Brooklyn Medical Centre in Cape Town a conditional exemption for use of the unregistered medicine, under Section 21 of the Medicines and related Substances Control Act 101 of 1965. Both TAC and the MCC agreed that section 21 exemptions do not offer a lasting solution to this crisis of availability of affordable medicines. 20.On 28th October 2000, TAC Deputy Chairperson, Mr Mark Heywood, made a presentation to the Human Rights, Law and Ethics Committee of the South African Medical Association (SAMA) on the subject of the affordability of essential HIV/AIDS medicines in South Africa. Members of the First Applicant and the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Applicant were present. 21.On November 16th 2000, TAC Deputy Chairperson, Mark Heywood, met with Ms Kathleen Laya, Public Policy Manager, Vicki Ehrich, Director, Corporate Affairs and Simon Sargent, Head of Government and Industry Affairs – all senior representatives of Glaxo Wellcome in London and discussed the need to resolve the court case. The meeting was also attended by a Labour Party Member of Parliament, MP Barbara Follett. According to Mr Heywood, although the litigation was discussed the representatives of Glaxo Wellcome did not indicate that the First Applicant had by then caused the matter to be set down for hearing. 22.On 1st December 2000, Mr Mark Heywood joined Mrs Miryeena Deeb of the First Applicant as presenters at a seminar hosted by the South African Human Rights Commission. The purpose of the seminar was to discuss the question of human rights versus property rights, and the pending litigation was extensively discussed. According to Mr. Heywood, Mrs Deeb did not indicate that the PMA had by then caused the matter to be set down for hearing. 23.On 1st December 2000, TAC members held a demonstration outside the offices of the PMA led by the General Secretary of COSATU, Mr Zwelinzima Vavi. A Memorandum calling for the withdrawal of the legal action was handed to Mrs Kirkman. Once again, the First Applicant failed to inform the TAC that the matter had been set down for a hearing. 24.On 13th January 2001, TAC members led by Executive member Nathan Geffen and TAC Chairperson Mr Zackie Achmat, gathered at Cape Town International Airport to welcome home Mr Morne Visser, a local actor, who was returning from holidaying in Thailand, bringing with him a batch of the generic medicine fluconazole for prescription to patients registered with the Brooklyn Medical Centre. 25.On 12 February 2001, more than 1500 people joined an inter-faith service and a march on Parliament to condemn drug company profiteering and to ask the government to produce generic anti-retrovirals. 26.The TAC has consistently highlighted patent abuse, profiteering and the unnecessary loss of lives due to HIV/AIDS in South Africa, poor countries and communities across the globe. For instance, TAC regularly condemned the pressure of the Fourth Applicant – Bristol-Myers Squibb for its unlawful pressure on Thailand for the manufacture of drugs – stavudine (D4T) and didanosine (DDI) that are not patented there and which the Fourth Applicant had not discovered. ######