- Learn about HIV
- Treatment in South Africa
- Popular Pages
- Site Guide
This is an archive of the Treatment Action Campaign's public documents from
December 1998 until October 2008. I created this website because the TAC's
website appears unmaintained and people were concerned that it
was becoming increasingly hard to find important documents.
The menu items have been slightly edited and a new stylesheet applied to the site. But none of the documents have been edited, not even for minor errors. The text appears on this site as obtained from the Internet Archive.
The period covered by the archive encompassed the campaign for HIV medicines, the civil disobedience campaigns, the Competition Commission complaints, the 2008 xenophobic violence and the PMTCT, Khayelitsha health workers and Matthias Rath court cases.
AIDS Law Project Press Statement, 9 May 2008, For Immediate Release
DEFEND ETHICAL DOCTORS FROM UNETHICAL POLITICIANS
DR MALCOLM NAUDE GOES TO LABOUR COURT TO CHALLENGE DISMISSAL IN 2001 FOR PROVIDING ARVs TO RAPE SURVIVORS
On Monday 12th May 2008, Dr Malcolm Naude is going to trial in the Labour Court in Braamfontein to challenge his unfair dismissal by the Department of Health in Mpumalanga in 2001. Dr Naude believes his dismissal as a medical officer at Nelspruit’s Rob Ferreira hospital was unfair discrimination arising from his acting in accordance with his conscience and medical best practice in prescribing anti-retroviral treatment to rape survivors.
In early 2000 the Nelspruit hospital staff (including doctors and nurses), the South African police services and the Greater Nelspruit Rape Intervention Project (GRIP) jointly established a rape crisis centre.
Part of the service included funding doctor’s prescriptions for anti-retrovirals (ARVs) to rape survivors. At the time, the Mpumalanga Department of Health opposed the prescribing of ARVs and issued an instruction that hospital doctors were not permitted to do so. Dr Naude and other doctors believed this was an unwarranted interference in the exercise of their professional discretion in making clinical and ethical decisions in the care and treatment of patients. They continued to prescribe ARVs where this was required.
In February 2001, the Mpumalanga DOH requested GRIP to vacate the care-rooms where it provided services at the hospital. It also started legal proceedings against GRIP to prevent it from operating in the hospital. In June 2001 Dr Naude provided an affidavit in support of GRIP’s case opposing the eviction. In response the Mpumalanga DOH terminated his services.
Attempts to settle this case have been spurned leaving Dr Naude with no option but to pursue it in the Labour Court. Although the dismissal took place seven years ago, the issues clearly remain relevant given the current attacks by the KZN MEC for Health on rural doctors in Manguzi.
Stand by Our Doctors!
For further information, contact
Mark Heywood, Director AIDS Law Project
Cell: 083 634 8806